<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Best Gay Blogs &#187; civil unions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bestgayblogs.com/tag/civil-unions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com</link>
	<description>Bringing you the best gay blogs on the web with daily updates!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:22:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Aloha Civil Unions</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2011/02/featured-political-blogs/aloha-civil-unions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2011/02/featured-political-blogs/aloha-civil-unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=16100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would appear that after the state&#8217;s Senate approved a bill earlier this week that would legalize civil unions for gay couples in the rainbow state, that bill is expected to become law. According to a post on KITV.com: The bill passed 18 to 5. Gov. Neil Abercrombie said he would sign the bill into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that after the state&#8217;s Senate approved a bill earlier this week that would legalize civil unions for gay couples in the rainbow state, that bill is expected to become law.<span id="more-16100"></span></p>
<p>According to a post on <a href="http://www.kitv.com/politics/26891388/detail.html" target="_blank"><strong>KITV.com</strong></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The bill passed 18 to 5. Gov. Neil Abercrombie said he would sign the bill into law. That could happen as soon as this week.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.kitv.com/politics/26891388/detail.html" target="_blank"><strong>More here!</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2011/02/featured-political-blogs/aloha-civil-unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Principles Over Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2011/02/featured-political-blogs/principles-over-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2011/02/featured-political-blogs/principles-over-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allan Kittleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=15822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s very rare when a politician will stand up for what he really believes in despite of what the rest of their political party thinks&#8230;especially when we&#8217;re talking about the socially conservative GOP. But that&#8217;s exactly what one Maryland Republican has done and it speaks volumes about the character of this man. According to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very rare when a politician will stand up for what he really believes in despite of what the rest of their political party thinks&#8230;especially when we&#8217;re talking about the socially conservative GOP.<span id="more-15822"></span></p>
<p>But that&#8217;s exactly what one Maryland Republican has done and it speaks volumes about the character of this man.</p>
<p>According to a post at: <a href="http://www.stevecharing.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Steve Charing OUTSpoken</strong></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The GOP has devised a moniker for these moderates: RINO—Republicans In Name Only. There  is no place in the Republicans’ so-called “big tent” for RINOs, and so  they will vanish at some point, switch parties, or struggle to  persevere.</em></p>
<p><em>But in Maryland, one Republican social moderate has taken a stand and put principles over politics. Former  Senate Minority Leader Allan H. Kittleman (Carroll, Howard) announced  one week before the General Assembly was convened that he would  introduce a bill that would grant all couples—gay and straight—civil  unions.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Find out where this got him at <a href="http://www.stevecharing.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Steve Charing OUTSpoken</strong></a>!  I&#8217;m sure you can guess the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2011/02/featured-political-blogs/principles-over-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Unions in Illionios?</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/12/featured-political-blogs/civil-unions-in-illionios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/12/featured-political-blogs/civil-unions-in-illionios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=14983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it&#8217;s not marriage, but it&#8217;s certainly a step in the right direction for LGBT couples living in Illinois.  On Tuesday of last week, the state&#8217;s House voted to approve legislation that would legalize civil unions.According to a post on NBC Chicago: The Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act &#8212; SB1716 &#8212; passed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s not marriage, but it&#8217;s certainly a step in the right direction for LGBT couples living in Illinois.  On Tuesday of last week, the state&#8217;s House voted to approve legislation that would legalize civil unions.<span id="more-14983"></span>According to a post on <a href="http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/illinois-house-civil-unions-sb1716-111084389.html#ixzz16sw2XQw3" target="_blank"><strong>NBC Chicago</strong></a>:</p>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div><em>The Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act &#8212; <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=1716&amp;GAID=10&amp;GA=96&amp;DocTypeID=SB&amp;LegID=44423&amp;SessionID=76" target="_blank">SB1716</a> &#8212; passed 61 to 52.  The Senate is expected to also pass the bill and <a title="Pat Quinn (Politician)" href="http://www.nbcchicago.com/topics?topic=Pat+Quinn+%28Politician%29">Gov. Pat Quinn</a> has said he would sign it.</em></p>
<p><strong>Source: <a href="http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/illinois-house-civil-unions-sb1716-111084389.html#ixzz16sw2XQw3" target="_blank">www.nbcchicago.com</a></strong></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/12/featured-political-blogs/civil-unions-in-illionios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shame on Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/01/featured-political-blogs/shame-on-hawaii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/01/featured-political-blogs/shame-on-hawaii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=10443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you think of Hawaii you usually think of fun in the sun, tourists, honeymoons, beaches, surfers, palm trees half naked men and woman. Yet the people who actually live there to my surprise are very conservative. In a state where you think people would have more of an open mind they are about to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you think of Hawaii you usually think of fun in the sun, tourists, honeymoons, beaches, surfers, palm trees half naked men and woman. <span id="more-10443"></span>Yet the people who actually live there to my surprise are very conservative. In a state where you think people would have more of an open mind they are about to vote down civil unions for gay people. Civil unions?! Usually in states conservatives use the argument “call it something else and we will be ok with it” yet here they are calling it civil unions and their argument this time? “It’s to close to marriage!”.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.homoradical.com/2010/01/shame-on-hawaii.html" target="_blank"><em><strong>More at: HomoRadical!</strong></em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/01/featured-political-blogs/shame-on-hawaii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are They Proud?</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/01/featured-political-blogs/why-are-they-proud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/01/featured-political-blogs/why-are-they-proud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Repubicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOProud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Barber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter LaBarbera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=10309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter LaBarbera, who runs Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, said he disputes &#8220;their definition of ’conservative,’ which would have the movement’s Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.&#8221; Matt Barber, who heads the Liberty Counsel, has been actively seeking a boycott of the event unless GOProud was dismissed as a co-sponsor. &#8220;Among other things, GOProud advocates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter LaBarbera, who runs Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, said he disputes &#8220;their definition of ’conservative,’ which would have the movement’s Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.&#8221;<span id="more-10309"></span></p>
<p>Matt Barber, who heads the Liberty Counsel, has been actively seeking a boycott of the event unless GOProud was dismissed as a co-sponsor.</p>
<p>&#8220;Among other things, GOProud advocates in favor of both ’gay marriage’ and ’civil unions,’ against pro-marriage constitutional amendments ; is pushing for the repeal of ’Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ and advocates in favor of federal ’partnership benefits’ for homosexuals,&#8221; LaBarbera quoted Barber as writing in an open email.</p>
<p>Now Focus on the Family has responded. Senior Vice-President Tom Minnery told right-wing site One News Now he has no problem with other CPAC co-sponsors disagreeing with Focus on the Family, including GOProud.</p>
<p>&#8220;We think we’ve got to engage the broader conservative movement and to be salt and light in that environment,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We believe that social conservatism, biblical Christianity has a lot to say to the political culture&#8211;and we want to be where the action is, so that’s why we’re engaging it.&#8221;</p>
<p>He opposes the boycott. Instead, he advocated coming to the conference &#8220;to counter the agenda of GOProud.&#8221;</p>
<p>On its website, GOProud wrote, &#8220;GOProud looks forward to continuing to work with the conservative movement to promote policies that will improve the lives of all Americans, including gays and lesbians.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edgeboston.com/index.phhttp://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&amp;sc=&amp;sc2=news&amp;sc3=&amp;id=101325p?ch=news&amp;sc=&amp;sc2=news&amp;sc3=&amp;id=101325" target="_blank"><em><strong>More at: Edge Boston!</strong></em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2010/01/featured-political-blogs/why-are-they-proud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie Wants to Ban Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/10/featured-political-blogs/chris-christie-wants-to-ban-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/10/featured-political-blogs/chris-christie-wants-to-ban-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heterosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=8797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t confuse New Jersey gubernatorial hopeful Chris Christie with Florida Gov. Charlie Crist. Sure, their names sound similar. And yes, both are (lower case h) heterosexual. And neither of them like the gays very much. But while Crist — who called civil unions for gays &#8220;fine&#8221; — backed off support for Florida&#8217;s constitutional ban on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t confuse New Jersey gubernatorial hopeful Chris Christie with Florida Gov. Charlie Crist. Sure, their names sound similar. And yes, both are (lower case h) heterosexual.<span id="more-8797"></span> And neither of them like the gays very much. But while Crist — who called civil unions for gays &#8220;fine&#8221; — backed off support for Florida&#8217;s constitutional ban on gay marriage (which passed anyhow), Jersey&#8217;s Christie is going gung-ho over the possibility!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.queerty.com/chris-christie-wants-to-be-governor-of-new-jersey-and-ban-gay-marriage-20091012/" target="_blank"><em><strong>Read more at: Queerty!</strong></em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/10/featured-political-blogs/chris-christie-wants-to-ban-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Considers Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/10/featured-political-blogs/illinois-considers-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/10/featured-political-blogs/illinois-considers-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Sun Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather Steans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=8659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A state senator from Edgewater said she plans today to introduce a measure to legalize same-sex marriage in Illinois, the first time such a bill would have been up for consideration in the Senate. Sen. Heather Steans, a first-term Democrat whose district encompasses the state&#8217;s largest concentration of gay and lesbian residents, said her &#8220;Equal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A state senator from Edgewater said she plans today to introduce a measure to legalize same-sex marriage in Illinois, the first time such a bill would have been up for consideration in the Senate.<span id="more-8659"></span></p>
<p>Sen. Heather Steans, a first-term Democrat whose district encompasses the state&#8217;s largest concentration of gay and lesbian residents, said her &#8220;Equal Marriage Act&#8221; will open a new front in the effort to provide full legal rights to same-sex couples.</p>
<p>Until now, gay-rights activists in Illinois have focused their efforts on gaining approval in the Illinois House for a &#8220;civil unions&#8221; bill that essentially would provide same-sex couples with most of the basic rights that accrue from marriage &#8212; without some of the controversy of calling it that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/brown/1800741,CST-NWS-brown01.article" target="_blank"><em><strong>Read the entire post at: Chicago Sun Times!</strong></em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/10/featured-political-blogs/illinois-considers-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Couples Pay Extra 1 Billion in Taxes Yearly</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/04/featured-political-blogs/gay-couples-pay-extra-1-billion-in-taxes-yearly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/04/featured-political-blogs/gay-couples-pay-extra-1-billion-in-taxes-yearly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[April 15th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Couples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=6406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The April 15th tax filing deadline is a reminder of the inequalities remaining in the way the United States handles same-sex relationships.  Gay couples in state-sanctioned domestic partnerships, civil unions or same-sex marriages often pay higher taxes because they do not get the federal tax benefits that go with marriage. While Massachusetts is the only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The April 15th tax filing deadline is a reminder of the inequalities remaining in the way the United States handles same-sex relationships.  <span id="more-6406"></span>Gay couples in state-sanctioned domestic partnerships, civil unions or same-sex marriages often pay higher taxes because they do not get the federal tax benefits that go with marriage.</p>
<p>While Massachusetts is the only state to allow gay marriage, nine other states and Washington D.C. have begun offering civil unions or domestic partnerships that give some or all of the state level legal protections of marriage.  But for couples in state-sanctioned domestic partnerships, civil unions or same-sex marriages, filing federal income taxes can involve doing three sets of paperwork instead of one.  That’s because the state-sanctioned unions do not enable couples to file federal taxes jointly due to the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which prohibits the Federal Government from treating same-sex relationships as marriages, even if they are recognized as marriages by the state.</p>
<p>Read more at <a href="http://www.gayexecutive.com/" target="_blank"><strong><em>Gay Executive.com</em></strong></a> where they seek to provide career, financial and political information and advice to gay professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2009/04/featured-political-blogs/gay-couples-pay-extra-1-billion-in-taxes-yearly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Survey Says</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2008/07/featured-political-blogs/and-the-survey-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2008/07/featured-political-blogs/and-the-survey-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Political Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=2145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you had three choices regarding the laws governing same-sex marriage, what would you choose? 1. Same-sex couples should be allowed legally to marry. 2. Same-sex couples should be allowed legally to form civil unions but not marry, or 3. Same-sex couples should not be allowed to obtain legal recognition of their relationships. Well, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bestgayblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/fued1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2146" title="fued1" src="http://www.bestgayblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/fued1.jpg" alt="" width="290" height="200" /></a>If you had three choices regarding the laws governing same-sex marriage, what would you choose? 1. Same-sex couples should be allowed legally to marry. 2. Same-sex couples should be allowed legally to form civil unions but not marry, or<span id="more-2145"></span> 3. Same-sex couples should not be allowed to obtain legal recognition of their relationships.</p>
<p>Well, the pollsters at Quinnipiac University posed that question, which is certain to become more prominent as the presidential general election campaign unfolds, to 1,783 Americans across the country.</p>
<p>Read what the finding were at <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/gay-marriage-po.html" target="_blank">latimesblogs.latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2008/07/featured-political-blogs/and-the-survey-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Rights = Civil War?</title>
		<link>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2008/07/more-entries/do-civil-unions-civil-rights-civil-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2008/07/more-entries/do-civil-unions-civil-rights-civil-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marraige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestgayblogs.com/?p=1802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil unions could be a possible vehicle. Then a stand-alone bill limited to same sex immigration rights, similar to the Uniting Americans Family Act could work. He seemed to imply that without that vehicle, it wouldn’t work. More broadly, if DOMA is repealed, then granting federal benefits to couples who are civil unioned (or married, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civil unions could be a possible vehicle. Then a stand-alone bill limited to same sex immigration rights, similar to the Uniting Americans Family Act could work. He seemed to imply that without that vehicle, it wouldn’t work. More broadly, if DOMA is repealed, then granting federal benefits to couples who are civil unioned (or married, although he didn’t say married) would realize immigration rights. <span id="more-1802"></span>Immigration is one of those 1200 federal benefits he so often says he wants to grant gay couples in civil unions.  Read all about it at <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/07/between-love-an.html">theatlantic.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bestgayblogs.com/2008/07/more-entries/do-civil-unions-civil-rights-civil-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

